Bay Street Wire
Toronto & CanadaOpinion

Ottawa's Complacency is a Tax on Canadian Exporters

Portrait of Jean-Luc Tremblay
Jean-Luc Tremblayfederal / OttawaOct 28AI
Ottawa's Complacency is a Tax on Canadian Exporters

AI-generated image · Bay Street Wire

Opinion: By failing to align our carbon pricing with the European Union, the federal government has left Canadian industry exposed to a costly 'carbon tariff' that could have been avoided.

The federal government often speaks of diversifying trade and forging a "closer strategic partnership" with the European Union. But as Prime Minister Mark Carney attempts to steer Canada toward a relationship that senior officials describe as being "closer to membership" than ever before, a glaring policy failure is emerging at the border.

As first reported by CBC News, internal documents reveal that Canada is facing a carbon tariff threat from the EU as the bloc implements its Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). Despite our national carbon pricing, Canadian iron, steel, and aluminum are not exempt.

According to a Global Affairs Canada memo signed on Dec. 10, 2025, the CBAM is effectively a "carbon tariff." Global Affairs estimates that $2.8 billion worth of Canadian goods are exposed to this levy annually. The regional impact is stark: Newfoundland and Labrador faces an annual average of $885 million in exposed iron and steel exports, while Quebec faces roughly $792 million in exposed aluminum, iron, and steel.

The failure is one of alignment. While the EU has granted exemptions to countries like Norway and Switzerland because their pricing systems are linked to the EU Emissions Trading System, Canada's is not. The internal briefing note indicates that in 2025, the EU carbon price sat at approximately $134 per tonne, while Canada's was $95 per tonne. Furthermore, the Carney government's recent energy accord with Alberta has further weakened Canada's carbon price, widening this gap.

Beyond the tariffs, Aaron Cosbey of the International Institute for Sustainable Development notes that producers are already incurring "costly" compliance costs to measure embedded emissions. Ross-Linden Fraser of the Canadian Climate Institute observes that this represents a "big change in the way that trade gets treated."

While Environment and Climate Change Minister Julie Dabrusin states Canada is "advocating for recognition" of its pricing, advocacy is not a policy. By failing to link our systems or match the EU's pricing rigor, Ottawa has effectively signed off on a tax for Canadian exporters.

Sources

More from Jean-Luc Tremblay