Bay Street Wire
Tech & BusinessOpinion

Budget Disruptor or E-Waste? Putting the MacBook Neo Up Against the Competition

Portrait of Theo Lindqvist
Theo Lindqvistconsumer gadgets & hardwareAug 10AI
Budget Disruptor or E-Waste? Putting the MacBook Neo Up Against the Competition

AI-generated image · Bay Street Wire

The MacBook Neo set a high bar for affordable productivity, but a new $450 challenger from Chuwi claims it can undercut the price. I'm digging into the data to see if the Neo is still the king of the budget hill.

The MacBook Neo entered the market as a genuine disruptor, offering a combination of build quality and performance starting at $599 that Windows laptops struggled to match. Even with a price increase to $699, it remains the benchmark for budget productivity. However, as The Verge first reported, the arrival of the Chuwi Unibook—a $450 Windows laptop—raises the question of whether a cheaper alternative can actually deliver.

According to reporting from The Verge, the Chuwi Unibook attempts to undercut the Neo with an aluminum build and Intel's new Wildcat Lake processor. On paper, the value proposition is tempting, but hands-on testing reveals a different story. The Verge notes that while the Unibook is affordable and offers a wide array of ports, the actual user experience is marred by a "washed out" screen that covers only 64 percent of the sRGB color space and peaks at 300 nits. The build quality is also a point of contention; despite the metal chassis, The Verge reports it feels cheap and exhibits significant flex.

Performance is where the gap between the two machines becomes a chasm. The MacBook Neo is powered by the A18 Pro chip, featuring a six-core CPU and a five-core GPU. In contrast, the Chuwi Unibook utilizes the Intel Core 3 304 processor—the lowest-end of the Wildcat Lake series—which consists of one performance core and four low-power efficiency cores, paired with a single GPU core.

In benchmark testing conducted by The Verge, the MacBook Neo trounces the Unibook across single-core and multicore CPU performance, as well as graphics. The difference is most stark in real-world productivity tasks. In an Adobe Premiere 4K export test, the MacBook Neo completed the task in 8 minutes and 30 seconds. The Chuwi Unibook took over an hour (specifically 1 hour, 9 minutes, and 29 seconds) to export the same video.

Memory management further separates the two. Both the Neo and the Unibook as tested come with 8GB of RAM. However, The Verge reports that 8GB is a significant hindrance on Windows 11. Following a fresh reboot, the Unibook's Windows 11 OS occupies between 4.6GB and 5GB of memory. Opening a few messaging apps, a music streamer, and a handful of Chrome tabs can push usage to 7GB, leading to Chrome crashes when pushing beyond 20 tabs. The Verge notes that the MacBook Neo handles these workloads more efficiently before slowing down.

There is one area where the budget disruptor finds a sliver of success: storage speed. The Verge's data shows the UniBook has a slightly faster SSD than the MacBook Neo, with sustained read speeds of 2394.57 MB/s compared to the Neo's 1735.91 MB/s, and sustained write speeds of 2092.66 MB/s against the Neo's 1684.05 MB/s.

Despite the storage edge, the overall hardware experience on the Unibook is described by The Verge as "unpleasant." The reviewer highlighted an "absolutely awful" trackpad that is so stiff to click that the chassis flexes under the pressure, along with poor speakers and a subpar webcam.

Ultimately, while the Chuwi Unibook targets a lower price point, the performance disparity suggests that the MacBook Neo's productivity "beast" status remains intact. The Unibook's struggle with basic multitasking and creative workloads confirms that in the budget hardware space, the difference between $450 and $699 is the difference between a machine that feels like e-waste and one that actually gets work done.

Sources

More from Theo Lindqvist